We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
Customize Consent Preferences
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
โSEC Chair Gary Gensler will be in the hot seat on Tuesday, the star witness before the full U.S. House Committee on Financial Services on the topic of โOversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission.โ The next day, the Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion will take up draft legislation relating to stablecoins.
On the regulatory front, Gensler has found himself again under fire from within his own agency, with SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce on Friday filing a robust dissent against Genslerโs latest policy move, which changes the statutory definition of a securities exchange to include cryptocurrency and digital asset exchanges.
Gensler said amendments to the definition of โexchangeโ under the federal Exchange Act Rule are necessary to address platforms that trade crypto asset securities, including โso-called โDeFiโ systems,โ asserting that โmany crypto trading platforms already come under the current definition of an exchange.โ
Pierce titled her rebuttal, โRendering Innovation Kaput.โ
โRather than embracing the promise of new technology as we have done in the past, here we propose to embrace stagnation, force centralization, urge expatriation, and welcome extinction of new technology,โ Pierce wrote, going as far as to say the SECโs release โundermines fundamental First Amendment protections.โ
The dispute over the definition of an exchange is only one of the items on the Financial Services Committee agenda, however.
โThis hearing will examine the regulatory developments, rulemakings, and activities that the SEC has undertaken in the period since the last hearing on October 5, 2021,โ explained the committee majority staff, including the definition change that โpotentially [expands] the SECโs authority over digital asset trading platforms.โ
Also on the docket, a SEC declaration from last March calling on digital asset custodians to change the way they report liabilities and assetsโwhich some lawmakers said increased potential losses. The committee will also revisit a SEC proposal made in February that called for registered investment advisors to include Bitcoin holdings among other assets held by โqualified custodians.โ
โIn what is becoming something of a habit, the Commission is once more proposing to dictate contract provisions involving entities the Commission does not regulate,โ Peirce said at the time. โThe Commission does not have authority to regulate custodians directly, but we propose to regulate them indirectly.โ
The next day, Congress will take up the topic, โUnderstanding Stablecoinsโ Role in Payments and the Need for Legislation.โ The Wednesday hearing agenda includes reviewing 72 pages of draft legislation โto provide requirements for payment stablecoin issuers, research on a digital dollar, and for other purposes.โ
The draft bill includes extensive definitions, establishes requirements at the federal and state level to issue stablecoins, and sets up standards for interoperability, reporting, and enforcement. The legislation also calls for a two year moratorium on new stablecoins until a study can be completed by the U.S. Treasury.
Jeremy Allaire, Co-founder & CEO of Circle, called the bill โa product of bi-partisan effortsโ and โthe first comprehensive proposed law for Payment stablecoins.โ
โItโs an extraordinary moment for the future of the dollar in the world, and the future of currency on the internet,โ Allaire declared on Twitter. โItโs time for US leadership, and that means clear regulation and empowering entrepreneurship and innovation within the framework of US prudential law.โ
Among those expected to testify are Dante Disparte, Chief Strategy Officer and global policy head at Circle, Jake Chervinsky, Chief Policy Officer at the Blockchain Association, Columbia Business School adjunct assistant professor Austin Campbell, and Adrienne A. Harris, sSuperintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services.
Advising followers to tune into the Wednesday hearing, Allaire acknowledged that the proposed bill still needs more work.
โWhile comprehensive, there are clearly open and challenging issues with the bill as proposed, and now is the time for our country and political leaders to really dig in and get this right,โ he said. โThe role of the dollar in the world is at stake.โ
Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox.
Post Disclaimer
The information provided in our posts or blogs are for educational and informative purposes only. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information. We do not provide financial or investment advice. Readers should always seek professional advice before making any financial or investment decisions based on the information provided in our content. We will not be held responsible for any losses, damages or consequences that may arise from relying on the information provided in our content.
This website uses cookies and asks your personal data to enhance your browsing experience. We are committed to protecting your privacy and ensuring your data is handled in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).